57. Insert Interval
1. Description
You are given an array of non-overlapping intervals intervals where intervals[i] = [$start_i$, $end_i$] represent the start and the end of the $i^{th}$ interval and intervals is sorted in ascending order by $start_i$. You are also given an interval newInterval = [start, end] that represents the start and end of another interval.
Insert newInterval into intervals such that intervals is still sorted in ascending order by $start_i$ and intervals still does not have any overlapping intervals (merge overlapping intervals if necessary).
Return intervals after the insertion.
Note that you don’t need to modify intervals in-place. You can make a new array and return it.
2. Example
Example 1
Input: intervals = [[1,3],[6,9]], newInterval = [2,5]
Output: [[1,5],[6,9]]
Example 2
Input: intervals = [[1,2],[3,5],[6,7],[8,10],[12,16]], newInterval = [4,8]
Output: [[1,2],[3,10],[12,16]]
Explanation: Because the new interval [4,8] overlaps with [3,5],[6,7],[8,10].
3. Constraints
- 0 <= intervals.length <= 10$^{4}$
- intervals[i].length == 2
- 0 <= $start_i$ <= $end_i$ <= 10$^{5}$
- intervals is sorted by $start_i$ in ascending order.
- newInterval.length == 2
- 0 <= start <= end <= 10$^{5}$
4. Solutions
Array
n = intervals.size()
Time complexity: O(n)
Space complexity: O(1)
class Solution {
public:
vector<vector<int>> insert(const vector<vector<int>> &intervals, vector<int> interval) {
const int n = intervals.size();
vector<vector<int>> merged_intervals;
merged_intervals.reserve(n + 1);
int i = 0;
while (i < n && intervals[i][1] < interval[0]) {
merged_intervals.push_back(intervals[i]);
++i;
}
while (i < n && intervals[i][0] <= interval[1]) {
interval[0] = min(interval[0], intervals[i][0]);
interval[1] = max(interval[1], intervals[i][1]);
++i;
}
merged_intervals.push_back(interval);
while (i < n) {
merged_intervals.push_back(intervals[i]);
++i;
}
return merged_intervals;
}
};
Binary Search
n = intervals.size()
Time complexity: O(n)
Space complexity: O(1)
// Binary search does not improve overall time complexity and it is still O(n).
class Solution {
public:
vector<vector<int>> insert(vector<vector<int>> intervals, vector<int> newInterval) {
auto left_iter = lower_bound(
intervals.begin(),
intervals.end(),
newInterval[0],
[](const vector<int> &interval, const int value) { return interval[0] < value; });
auto right_iter = left_iter;
while (left_iter != intervals.begin() && (left_iter - 1)->back() >= newInterval[0]) {
--left_iter;
newInterval[0] = left_iter->front();
newInterval[1] = max(left_iter->back(), newInterval[1]);
}
while (right_iter != intervals.end() && right_iter->front() <= newInterval[1]) {
newInterval[1] = max(right_iter->back(), newInterval[1]);
++right_iter;
}
auto iter = intervals.erase(left_iter, right_iter);
intervals.insert(iter, newInterval);
return intervals;
}
};